tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357620132379563790.post1401145098218257668..comments2023-04-13T17:09:27.720+01:00Comments on Englands Freedome, Souldiers Rights: Lex TrooperisTrooper Thompsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01505221473081871071noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357620132379563790.post-67810309434071051052011-10-10T22:51:53.543+01:002011-10-10T22:51:53.543+01:00I thought I got a fair hearing though.I thought I got a fair hearing though.Trooper Thompsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505221473081871071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357620132379563790.post-37366211958001705072011-10-10T18:48:54.342+01:002011-10-10T18:48:54.342+01:00Truly painful. I ventured past that link fearing w...Truly painful. I ventured past that link fearing what I knew I might find. I made it about twenty comments in before I wanted to end it all.<br /><br />It's like they're running through a rehearsed drill rather than responding to a clear argument. All the old strawmen pop up whether you mentioned them or not. For example you write about 'natural rights', an objective and ontological philosophy and they smear you as advocating the 'common sense' of the football terraces in place of any formal systems of law. That they see the canon of natural rights philosophy as irrational emotive knuckle dragging is horrifying.<br /><br />They see a top down monocentric legal environment as unquestionably essential due to the complexity of everything that law book must regulate. Everyone has to submit to the unnecessary burden of a legal system that can cope with the hostile take over of an international conglomerate whether they will ever require such tools or not. All those pages of crap you may see in the tenancy agreement for a bedsit are not for the benefit of either party to that deal. Rather, those terms lie redundant until the next lease of Hong Kong or somesuch.<br /> A common criticism of polycentric law is that different codes of law coexisting in the same time and place would be a bad thing, but as the above point hopefully illustrates, this is a strength not a weakness of the polycentric legal environment that I suspect would be inevitable in a.voluntary world.<br /><br />Current law is unfathomable precisely because it is intended to be so. 'Legalese' is at once, a barrier to entry, a tool of deception and control and an insurmountable disability to those outside the elite.<br /><br />Why do these mindless tools instinctively react against clear reason in favour of spurious excuses for oppression? Do they know what, if anything they stand for or do they simply indulge in tribal muck throwing?<br /><br />Pitiful and depressing.<br /><br />Ps YouTube search stefan molyneux dealing with 'lifeboat' challenges and their irrelevancewillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13852417362930313981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357620132379563790.post-60553152102230100152011-10-10T17:26:06.288+01:002011-10-10T17:26:06.288+01:00You've evidently got far more patience than I ...You've evidently got far more patience than I have, especially when it comes to arguing with people who think laws being so complex no normal person can understand them is actually a good thing.Andrewnoreply@blogger.com