With the sixth anniversary of the 9-11 attacks approaching, it is time for people of good will to stand up and publicly challenge the monstrous lies of the elite, their government minions and the lapdog media that serves their agenda.
Seeking the truth – a moral imperative on us all – starts with a personal decision. This first decision is the hardest one; to face up to the possibility that the official story is not only flawed (as any account may be) but a tissue of lies. The implications of this are so huge, many people continue to shy away from examining it, even though they secretly suspect the so-called truthers are right, or at least harbour doubts as to what really happened.
Once you have managed to override the mental conditioning that we have all been exposed to ever since the first plane struck, the scales quickly fall from your eyes. The official story crumbles to dust. There is virtually no aspect of the official account that stands up to more than cursory scrutiny.
Of course, for those not ready to “take the red pill”, comfort can be found in the loving embrace of falsehood, thereby confirming Hitler's chilling observation that:
...since the great masses of the people in the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds they more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true.
The time for doubt and wavering is past. Now is the time to stand up for truth, love and justice – tomorrow may be too late.
3 comments:
the central thesis for peoples denial of the likely truth of 9/11 rests on the notion that western nations/state actors would not be involved or have not been involved in terrorist acts.
this is an utterly bogus position that can be buried by a single body of work.
if anyone is interested in taking a first step into understanding the frightening possibilities surrounding 9/11 then i would look no further than;
"NATOs secret armies" by Daniele Ganser.
I don't doubt there are plenty of precedents for state terrorism involving the West. I think we also need to follow the money. People have largely overlooked the basest and most common motive in crime - the love of money.
You see stories of people murdered for their mobile phone. The attacks of 9-11 made a small group of people a huge amount of money. If Hercule Poirot was investigating this, he'd want Larry Silverstein in the parlour alongside Bin Laden and the politicos for the unmasking ceremony. "All of you had a motive ..."
the problem with the money trail is that it is so indirect. the massive profits garnered are done so with no direct connection to the crimes. it is the highest level of organised crime on the earth.
the book I mentioned above though does touch on this, if indirectly. One of the secret groups utilised by NATO/US was the P2 far-right masonic group in Italy. When they were unmasked and their leaders schloss raided a list of nearly 1000 members was found, and to quote the book 'it read like a "Whos Who"' of the Italian conservative political/military/economic/judicial/professional elite.
Post a Comment