Showing posts with label Medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medicine. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Doctors call for MANDATORY participation in clinical trials

With every day we seem to descend further into a fabian hell. Via Infowars I read an article from the American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (!?) calling for mandatory participation in drug and vaccine trials.

The argument goes something like; 'well, the state can conscript people and send them off to war, so why the hell not conscript people for medical experiments?'

Read it yourself if you don't believe me.

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Doctors urge public to take up smoking

As it has become increasingly evident that stray smoke from a cigarette is the equivalent of mustard gas laced with airborne ebola, and in fact much, much worse than the stuff smokers are sucking down, doctors have been forced by the logic (sic) of their argument to concede that, well, you're better off smoking it yourself. Said one top official at the BMA: "we did want to ban smoking, but now we may try to make it compulsory."

ASH were unavailable for comment, being on a cultural exchange visit to North Korea.

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Barely legal

How ludicrous is the state's position on cannabis.

The courts, usually so reluctant to punish law breakers, seem to relish making an exception when it comes to little old ladies caught growing the herb for medicinal use. All of a sudden, the Law’s the Law, notwithstanding how happy these bewigged fools are to indulge a real criminal, say someone who had broken into an old woman’s house and beaten and robbed her - that’s all excusable in the eyes of our judiciary, indeed the ‘justice’ minister Ken Clarke would be issuing on-the-spot fines for rape, if he thought he could get away with it, but I digress.

Doctors are moaning because they can't prescribe Sativex, a pharma product derived from the sacred plant, no doubt developed with tax-payer-funded largesse. It sits idle, due to tight-fisted bureaucrats who doubt its efficacy justifies the cost - £77 per week.

I think I see a solution. It’s called freedom. All the government has to do is get out of the way and bin its destructive prohibition of the plant. That will not happen in the short term, because the government is populated by a bunch of gutless hypocrites, who are happy to smirk over their own use of the drug, but won’t dare do anything radical. The problem, or one at least, is these politicians have no principles in the ordinary sense of the word. A principle to them is something to conjure with only when necessary to mislead the public.

Monday, 31 January 2011

From the dungeons of the Medical Inquisition

Natural News report:

"In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal and author Brian Deer. Documents just made public reveal that another medical research team which included a senior pathologist independently documented evidence of a possible MMR vaccine - autism link 14 months before Dr Wakefield's paper first appears in The Lancet -- based on several of the same children appearing in Dr Wakefield's study."

Read the article

Sunday, 9 January 2011

Child flu shot contains mercury

As reported in The Daily Express:

"UP to a million under-fives have been inoculated against the flu virus with a controversial vaccine containing poisonous mercury.

Pandemrix has been given to almost a quarter of all healthy babies and young children as well as thousands of older children with health problems.

Inquiries by the Sunday Express reveal it contains a preservative made with a form of mercury that was phased out of childhood vaccines in 2004 after fears about its safety.

The preservative, called thimerosal, has been linked with autism and developmental disorders in children and was withdrawn from childhood vaccines in the United States and parts of Europe 10 years ago."

Go to article

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Tasmania: number one in the world



I thought I'd seen a typo in Fraser's post on Opium and Afghanistan, over at An Individual Voice:
It seems that poppy and opium production is big business for some countries, especially Tasmania. Other countries include India, France, Turkey and Spain, why can you not add Afghanistan to that list ?

Did he really mean Tasmania? Indeed he did. The answer to the question is; of course it should be added to the list, but I doubt that the farmers of Tasmania would welcome it. It's ridiculous when you think about it: making a flower illegal.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Yeah, we've just got one case left

Not this old chestnut again! Apparently we're running out of swine flu vaccine, so you best run out and get it while you can.

Hey guys, don't save any for me. I didn't want it first time round, and it's no more appetizing for being left out the back of a Rumanian clinic for a year, or wherever you manage to dig up some supplies.

By the way, how's that investigation into collusion between WHO and the pharma corporations going? No news, huh?

Wednesday, 29 December 2010

Pregnant women: do not take the flu shot!

The 'health' authorities will try to force their dirty needles into you. They will tell you that there's no evidence that it will harm your baby. And that's right... because they refuse to accept the evidence.

Remember; they don't own your body. Do not allow them to bully you or pressurise you to take their filthy vaccine. Also remember, if you miscarry they will choose not to believe that it is linked to the vaccine, even if it happens within hours of the vaccination.

Instead of listening to that doctor with his targets and bonus payments, read some of these experiences.

Sunday, 19 December 2010

Pesky kids not listening to experts on swine flu shot

Aw, poor big pharma, they only want to help with their cocktails of aluminium, mercury, embalming fluid, bits of animal dna, rna and viruses (more commonly known as 'vaccinations'), but those pesky youngsters don't want to take their medicine. Apparently, they've been getting their information elsewhere than the approved sources, such as the Independent.

Thursday, 3 June 2010

Urine test for autism: echoes of Dr Wakefield's research

An interesting report here:

"A simple urine test could determine whether or not a young child has autism, according to new research. Children with the condition have a different chemical fingerprint in their urine than their non-autistic counterparts. It is therefore possible to differentiate between the two by looking at the by-products of gut bacteria and the body's metabolic processes in the children's urine, scientists believe. The findings, published tomorrow in the Journal of Proteome Research, suggest that ultimately a urine test will be able to detect autism in infants

People with autism are known to suffer from gastrointestinal disorders and have a different make-up of bacteria in their guts from non-autistic people. The exact biological significance of gastrointestinal disorders in the development of autism is unknown."

This was the subject of Dr Wakefield's research paper, which set out that many autistic children were suffering from undiagnosed gastrointestinal disorders. When he discovered the measles virus in the gut of a number of such children, and the strain of the virus was the same as that used in the MMR jab, he called for the triple vaccine to be withdrawn, and other measles vaccines to be used. The government then moved to prevent alternatives to the MMR being available in the country, thinking that they could force parents into having the MMR, and when that didn't work, they blamed Dr Wakefield and prosecuted a vendetta to destroy his career, which saw him struck off only recently on ludicrous trumped-up charges.

Monday, 24 May 2010

Dr Wakefield: guilty of nothing

The long drawn-out heresy trial of Dr Andrew Wakefield has ended according to the script. Usually the General Medical Council are dealing with one of their brethren who has sexually assaulted a patient, junked themselves with stolen pills or killed somebody, and they can generally be relied upon to close ranks around the miscreant. Dr Wakefield, however, has done something far worse: he published a report that broke the party line.

His research has never been debunked. These trumped-up charges reveal more about the medical establishment, its craven obeissance to big pharma and control-freak politicians, who tried to prevent supplies of the single measles vaccine entering the country, in order to force the MMR upon children. When this strong-arm tactic fails they have the gall to blame Dr Wakefield.

This auto-da-fe-style show trial convinces no one.

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Medical Inquisition: "Wakefield is a heretic - burn him!"

Be advised: health scares are only permitted when they are sanctioned by the government and make obscene amounts of money for the pharmaceutical corporations. Health scares that threaten big pharma's bottom line are VERBOTEN.

With that understood, it is no surprise that the medical establishment have pursued their vendetta against Dr Andrew Wakefield, for having the temerity to investigate something that shouldn't have been investigated, namely autism and the possible link with vaccination.



Hat tip for video: Fausty

Sunday, 10 January 2010

"One of the greatest medical scandals of the century"

These are the words of Wolfgang Wodarg, head of health at the Council of Europe, who accused big pharma of influencing the WHO into declaring a pandemic.

According to the Mail:

"This led to the pharmaceutical firms ensuring 'enormous gains', while countries, including the UK, 'squandered' their meagre health budgets, with millions being vaccinated against a relatively mild disease."

Keep digging Wolfgang. You'll never know what you'll find.

Friday, 30 October 2009

Swine flu shot causes miscarriage

If I find any mainstream press prepared to cover it, I'll post the link, but I won't hold my breath, because this is the information you, the dumb public, ain't supposed to get, but pregnant women are being pressurised to take the swine flu and seasonal flu shots and they are known to cause miscarriages. I heard a guy on the radio telling how his friend's wife was persuaded to take the shot and within 24 hours she miscarried. Yes, it's anecdotal. No, it's not hard science, but I believe what he said. The apologists for pharmacide industry will claim it's a coincidence, but if this woman had drunk half a bottle of tequila the night before she miscarried, or if she'd fallen down a flight of stairs or if anything out of the ordinary happened, would you not at least consider the risk? How much more so, when there are thousands of examples of similar things happening with other shots.

Thursday, 29 October 2009

Swine flu shot deaths reported in Sweden

The Digital Journal reports:

"There are reports from Sweden of possible deaths linked to the H1N1 vaccine; unconfirmed and unwelcome news which will surely complicate the very busy flu season that has descended on most of the northern hemisphere."

Hat tip: Infowars

Sunday, 18 October 2009

German ministers to receive flu vaccine without deadly adjuvants... unlike the rest of the population

According to Spiegel, the German government are to receive special, adjuvant-free flu shots, whereas everyone else (who is dumb enough to roll up their sleeve) will get the one with mercury, squalene (linked to Gulf War Syndrome) and, according to German lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg, cancerous animal cells. Mmm, tasty.

Prison Planet, covering the Spiegel story, state:

"Spiegel reports that there is an “open rebellion” by general medical professionals and child physicians in Germany over use of the toxic vaccine. Dieter Ludwig, chairman of the drug commission of the German medical profession, told Spiegel that health authorities have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

On July 13, the World Health Organization ordered the inclusion of the deadly adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine. WHO’s vaccine advisory panel is stacked executives from Baxter, Novartis, GSK and Sanofi. Baxter’s own scientists have stated in the New England Journal of Medicine that adjuvants do not improve antibody response."

I think I'm gonna pass on the cancerous animal cells, if it's all the same to you Doktor Mengele cocksuckers.

Saturday, 17 October 2009

Lethal injection

The New York Times writes:

"As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry. But those events will not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine. That poses a public relations challenge for federal officials, who remember how sensational reports of deaths and illnesses derailed the large-scale flu vaccine drive of 1976. This time they are making plans to respond rapidly to such events and to try to reassure a nervous public — and headline-hunting journalists — that the vaccine is not responsible."

You got that? The untested swine flu shot is expected to be linked to deaths and major health complications, and the authorities are getting ready to cover it up. This is seen as a 'public relations challenge', which will try to learn lessons from the last time they tried to mass-inject the public with an untested flu shot and many people died and many more suffered serious side-effects. This, it seems is not a problem in itself. The problem is when people find out about it.

Hat tip: Infowars

Thursday, 24 September 2009

Flu shots and body bags

What foresight for the Canadian authorities to ship a supply of body bags with their doses of the flu shot - a deadly cocktail of live viruses and poisonous adjuvants.

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

A message


DO NOT TAKE THE FLU SHOT

The more they want you to take it, the more you better not!

Sunday, 20 September 2009

"Should drugs be legalised? Of course, and as soon as possible"

The Guardian has got together a bunch of 'leading voices' to assert their views on drugs and the law. Here's Philip Pullman talking sense:

"Should drugs be legalised? Of course, and as soon as possible. Every human society we know about has used drugs to dull pain, to bring about sleep, to prolong wakefulness, to increase physical endurance, to induce hallucinations, or just to feel better and promote good fellowship. The war on drugs, so-called, is a policy of utter and unforgivable folly; you might as well make war on human nature.

Legalising drugs would have three huge and immediate benefits: it would cut the link between drugs and crime, and empty the prisons; it would ensure that supplies were pure and reliable and not cut with chalk or worse; and it would provide a vast new source of tax for the Treasury. No one was a bigger fan of Prohibition than Al Capone."