Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 May 2012

WWF: a journey into the Heart of Darkness of the enviro-lunatic eugenicists

Here are a couple of things worth reading:

Autonomous Mind's piece on the Met Office, and Euro Referendum's piece on the WWF, which leads on from Christopher Booker's column in the Telegraph.

I guess the only point I'd add is when you consider who set up WWF - Julian Huxley (head of the Eugenics movement in Britain, who proclaimed the task of Unesco, of which he was also head, with the rehabilitation of eugenics after Hitler had somewhat sullied its reputation), Prince Philip (of the 'I would like to be reincarnated as a particularly nasty virus and help deal with the population problem' quote) and Prince Bernhard (the ex-nazi who formed the Bilderberg Club), I'm not too surprised to see what they get up to.

'Saving the planet' for these people means saving it from us, the commoners, so they can have it all for themselves - just one big safari park for our so-called betters to roam free. Ah, the good life!

Saturday, 31 March 2012

World government under the cover of 'saving the planet' continues apace

Via Infowars, I note the 'Planet Under Pressure' conference that has just taken place in London. No surprises. All the usual suspects spouting their usual bullshit, demanding their usual solution, that being a world government, run by 'the experts' who are selflessly offering up themselves to 'serve' the rest of us, and indeed Gaia herself, in the role of philosopher kings. Here's an extract from their 'State of the Planet Declaration', telling us what we need:
Fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions is required to overcome barriers to progress and to move to effective Earth-system governance. Governments must take action to support institutions and mechanisms that will improve coherence, as well as bring about integrated policy and action across the social, economic and environmental pillars. Current understanding supports the creation of a Sustainable Development Council within the UN system to integrate social, economic and environmental policy at the global level. There is also strong support for strengthening global governance by including civil society, business and industry in decision-making at all levels.
My interpretation of that paragraph is that these scumbag motherfuckers want to see the world ruled over by a central-planning institution which will make the Soviet Union look like a village fete cake competition organising committe tea-and-biscuits afternoon at the vicarage.

The last sentence talks about 'including civil society' etc. This would be wholly contradictory with the above interpretation, if it were more than a flick of the bullfighter's cape. If you have a global committee deciding things, that is the decision-making process. The ordinary individual will have absolutely no influence, and neither will any number of individuals banding together, unless they are capable of defying the military might of an angry UN.

Even more stomach-churning is Annex 3: "Supporting statement from young people representing the voice of youth". One question: WHO THE FUCK APPOINTED YOU TO REPRESENT ANYONE?.

So, go read it and seethe.

Sunday, 11 December 2011

Libyan update

From an editorial from the Hindu:

Libya's interim government, the National Transitional Council (NTC), is getting no international help over the enormous problems it faces. To start with, the NTC has failed to restrain the militias that hold several areas and have killed thousands of people in attacks on alleged or real former supporters of Muammar al-Qadhafi. Reliable Libyan observers have likened the arbitrary killings, arrests, and torture to the former regime's brutalities. There have also been racist lynchings of African migrant labourers mistaken for mercenaries. A recent United Nations report characterises the militias as a major challenge to the NTC; it points out that women whom they detain are at particular risk. The NTC also faces political problems with Libya's severely divided society; five Amazigh or Berber leaders boycotted the November 24 swearing-in of the cabinet, saying that their ethnic group had not got enough posts. Nato, which deployed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 ostensibly to protect civilians but in reality to cause violent regime change, is making no attempt to intervene. The U.N. mandate ended on October 27, and the Atlantic alliance has rejected Tripoli's request that it protect Libyan frontiers against possible re-entry by Qadhafi loyalists who fled the country as the regime disintegrated.

Read the whole article.

Hat tip: Aangirfan

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Rothbard on the Rockefeller World Empire

I am in the midst of another volume by the great Murray Rothbard, this one being "Irrepressible Rothbard", a collection of his journalism from the last few years of his life. It is very enlightening to read recent history, not only does it show how we got to where we are, but also the underlying currents that drag us ever onwards to doom ... or redemption.

Here is a excerpt from an article entitled "Gang-stabbing the president", in which he comments on how, close to the 1992 presidential election, the neo-con media people and various other factions turned on Bush and started endorsing Slick Willy.
In addition to short-run venality, there are long-lived and crucially important interest groups who have great influence and power in American culture and American politics. These interest groups may have long-term ideologies, which while not “principles” in any conservative or libertarian sense, are based upon sophisticated views on how to further the long-term interests of themselves and their allies. The most important such interest group in American politics is, and has been for a half-century, the “Rockefeller World Empire,” that is, the corporate and financial Eastern Establishment headed, since World War II, by the Rockefeller interests and their allies. What the Rockefellers want should be no great surprise, embodied in the Rockefeller family member who almost became president of the United States: Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller. What the Rockefellers want is a world economic and therefore political government, run by themselves and their allies, a State-cartelized capitalism that will subsidize and privilege them, shored up by Keynesian inflationary programs of expanding consumer “purchasing power,” and particularly massive foreign aid to subsidize Rockefeller-oriented exports, as well as friendly bankers who bankroll both these export firms and the Third World governments who purchase their products. In addition, of course, an American foreign policy must fight for oil – for oil resources and investments, and regulate oil prices in accordance with Rockefeller guidelines. A particular dream is a “New World Order” run by the United States, in accordance with Rockefeller desires, as well as a World Reserve Bank that will inflate the world economy in a manner controlled by Rockefeller expertise. Domestically, the Rockefeller interests want an expanded welfare state, mobilized to be allied to their overall purposes.

All this is now called “enlightened” or “moderate” internationalism and devotion to the welfare state – all beloved by the intelligentsia, who are bought out by the largess of tax-exempt Rockefeller-allied foundations and organizations. What is less well-known is that this Big Business – Big Finance – Big Labor – Big Intellectuals and Media alliance has been going on for a long time: certainly since the New Deal. It is little known, for example, that such crucial New Deal statist “reforms” as the Social Security Act and the Wagner Act of the mid-1930s were put into place by a powerful and malevolent alliance of left-technocratic New Deal ideologues, and powerful Big Business leaders: notably John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s Industrial Relations Counselors and its successors, and W. Averill Harriman’s Business Advisory Council of the Department of Commerce.

So the premier clue to American politics, especially since World War II, is to look to the Eastern Establishment headed by the Rockefellers. It is well known that since the Rockefeller-run Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) (peacefully taken over from Morgan control after World War II) had gotten too large and unwieldy, it was supplemented in 1973 by David Rockefeller’s new, small, elite, and tightly controlled Trilateral Commission. When Rockefeller Republican Gerry Ford came into danger from Ronald Reagan in 1976, however, the Rockefeller forces were ready with Trilat Jimmy Carter, an unknown when he announced his candidacy toward the end of 1975, and who was vaulted to the nomination by hosannahs from the Trilat-controlled Respectable Media, ignited by the much-sought-after cover of Time magazine, edited by founding Trilat member Hedley W. Donovan.

The Carter administration was a remarkable phenomenon: for the entire Cabinet and sub-Cabinet, 26 members in all, from Carter and Vice President Mondale on down, were all Trilat members. It was an incredible takeover, especially when we consider that there were only 117 American members of the Trilateral Commission all told.

Americans have been conditioned by the glitz and circus and by corrupt Establishment political scientists to believe in the vital importance of political parties, and to analyze politics and governance on that basis. The loss of importance of political parties nowadays is generally conceded, but what Americans don’t realize is that parties have not been important in determining ideologies or issues since the nineteenth century.

We can rest assured that the power elite, the crucial special interest groups we have been analyzing, have no sentimental attachment to party labels. Republican? Democrat? Who cares, so long as they are under control by the “right” people. “What’s good for the ______ is the overriding consideration, and you can fill in the blank with any one of these power elite groups. (The most glaring example was the 1924 presidential election, when both President Calvin Coolidge and Democrat candidate John W. Davis, Jr. were personal friends, close buddies, and associates of J.P. Morgan, Jr., head of the powerful “House of Morgan.” Morgan, who, in this embarrassment of riches chose Coolidge, was delighted but not embarrassed by the situation.)

Friday, 10 June 2011

Bilderberg scum meeting again

Inside the Bilderberg Meeting - an artist's impression

I know this, because the BBC is running its periodic hit-piece on conspiracists, or why people keep asking their masters impertinent questions? Entitled: Bilderberg mystery: why do people believe in cabals? it starts thus:
Ordinary people can only guess at the goings-on at the meetings of the secretive Bilderberg Group, which is bringing together the world's financial and political elite this week. Conspiracy theories abound as to what is discussed and who is there. Why, asks Tom de Castella?
Ordinary people, huh? Certainly if we rely on the BBC to inform us, we can only guess. That's because the BBC has never lifted a finger to do its job and actually report. Not even a camera man to film the limos arriving, let alone trying to find out what is being discussed, and, as the article explains, if you dare to wonder you will be dismissed as a jew-hating nutter.

So much for the BBC. Happily we are no longer so reliant on gate-keepers like Orwell's Ministry of Truth, as there are news-gathering organisations who are prepared to put boots on the ground in search of a story.

Charlie Skelton is there again, which will make this his third year in a row. The change in perspective of Skelton has been something to warm the heart of truth-seekers. Three years ago he turned up in Greece, expecting to enjoy himself and have a laugh at the expense of the tinfoil hat brigade, but his rapid descent into a police-state-nightmare, being arrested more than once, being followed everywhere etc woke him up that something sinister lies at the heart of Bilderberg.

As ever, the question for the scoffers is this: please explain why a secret meeting involving the people listed here is not newsworthy, and not only not newsworthy, but so incredibly un-newsworthy that only crazy people would want to know what is going on?

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Bloody tourists

Sometimes the MSM is almost unlistenable. Bazza's visit is one such time. Some fourth-rate ham actor reading a teleprompted clicherama, and the journos are swooning in circle-jerk ecstacy. Bollocks to the lot of them. I don't give a flying fuck if the criminal cartel that runs Washington sends over its puppet in chief to spout on about shared history and spreading our values by bombing the shit out of anyone who won't go along.

Sunday, 15 May 2011

Strauss-Kahn arrested for sexual assault and attempted rape



What can we make of the news that IMF-head and likely French presidential candidate Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been arrested over the alleged sexual assault of a hotel chambermaid?

It all hinges on whether he's guilty, of course, which he denies. Obviously I can add nothing to the story. I'm just flagging it up, because it's pretty fucking amazing.

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Meet the good guys

Question: When is massacring, raping, even eating civilians okay?

Answer: When you're the UN-sanctioned good guys.

I have no doubt that brutality is being committed by both sides in Ivory Coast. Why the fuck the UN is joining one of those sides is more of a mystery.

It seems to me that we are seeing the true face of the UN emerging from the shadows, as it begins to impose on the world its concept of World Order, and that concept I suspect is not much different from a boot stamping on a human face for ever.

Sunday, 20 March 2011

Shooting fish in a barrel

Odyssey Dawn? Sounds like a dodgy '70s prog-rock album, but no, it's our new war; 'Krieg ohne Strategie'* as Spiegel aptly calls it. I note this, as I'm straining my language skills in the hope of getting a more accurate view from what the Ministry of Truth will be telling us.

What exactly is the plan? From the outside, it has the air of a hastily-arranged benefit gig to save the local orphanage - and no doubt its result will fill a few of those.

The West is going to stop Gaddaffi killing civilians? That's okay, then. Who could object.... what about the rebels, those under arms, who are actively engaged in a war against Gaddaffi's regime? Is he allowed to attack them? It seems not, as the destruction of the loyalist forces outside Benghazi indicate. But are the rebels to be held to a cease-fire, or is Gaddaffi supposed to do nothing while they reverse the territorial losses Gaddaffi has inflicted?

Given that, as far as I can see, Gaddaffi does still have support from a proportion of the population, and there's no way of judging how big that proportion is, how is this thing going to end? Is the West going to do what the rebels demand and assassinate Gaddaffi? That might make it easier to find an eventual solution, but there is no guarantee.

This new adventure has to be the most bare-facedly hypocritical act of aggression in a long time. Hypocritical because only a couple of weeks ago Cameron was touring the Middle East selling weapons to all the other tinpots, with which to massacre their restless populations, but for some reason, that's fine.

* 'War without strategy'

Saturday, 19 March 2011

Not Libya

Meanwhile amongst our allies, in the benign stability of Bahrain:
Manama. They turned over the limp, lifeless body of the young man,. His back was riddled with bullet wounds. His skull flopped open revealing a bloody mess and a gaping hole where the brain used to be before it was blown out by a high-velocity weapon at point-blank range.

A surgeon at Salmaniya Hospital in Manama said helplessly: “We could do nothing to save him.”

Ahmed Farhan was just one of several Bahrainis killed yesterday by state forces that went on a murderous rampage in mainly Shia towns and villages deemed to be supportive of the popular uprising against the autocratic US-backed regime headed by King Hamad al-Khalifa.

Another doctor said: “This is all-out war against civilians who are simply demanding democracy.”

As hundreds of injured were ferried along the corridors of the hospital, there was an atmosphere of dread among medics that the Persian Gulf island regime had lost all restraint under international law.

This was less than 24 hours after a large convoy of Saudi-led troops arrived in Bahrain, with the ostensible aim of “restoring stability”. At the same time, the Bahraini rulers declared: “The government will never tolerate any disruption of social peace.”
I'm sure, in the idle moments between planning the attack on Libya, our macho leaders will urge restraint both on the Bahraini government and the bullet-ridden opposition.

Monday, 20 December 2010

IPCC Official: “Climate Policy Is Redistributing The World's Wealth”

"Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection, says the German economist and IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer. The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated."

Hat tip: Militant Libertarian

Sunday, 19 December 2010

Brown surfaces stateside (feel free to keep him)

Gordon Brown is doing the rounds in the USA, trying to sell his autohagiography in between his main job, selling global government. He appeared on Jon Stewart's show, which is difficult to view over here, but a couple of snippets are available in this YouTube clip.

Monday, 29 November 2010

The Enemy State continued: now health foods are terrorism



Hat tip to Goodnight Vienna for posting this up. The agenda Hannan draws attention to is global. It is a prime example of how the New World Order is consolidating power. It clearly illustrates how corporations use the power of the state to prevent competition.

Monday, 22 November 2010

You are not my leaders and I am not your citizen

They can't even get through the first sentence without my bile rising.

"We, the leaders of the European Union and the United States, met today in Lisbon to re-affirm our close partnership. Our shared values and political experience and our deep economic interdependence constitute an extraordinary resource. As we both face new challenges, we want our partnership to bring greater prosperity and security to our 800 million citizens on the two sides of the Atlantic."
Trooper Thompson's Response
"You are not my leaders. I am not your citizen. I am a freeborn Englishman. You will not bring greater prosperity, you are parasites that destroy prosperity. You will not bring greater security. You are the greatest threat to our security and our liberty. Your plans are vainglorious hubris. You have learnt nothing from History, and future generations will revile your pride, your greed and your foolish arrogance."
Hat tip: Albion Alliance

Saturday, 20 November 2010

New World Order: in your face



Never let a crisis go to waste. The ultra-crooked banking mafia are casually announcing the end of national sovereignty. They created the crisis. Now they're posing as the saviours. Somebody slaughtered all the chickens. So it is necessary to improve coop security, and we are appointing Mr Fox.

My, isn't Strauss-Kahn well trained? 'Global governance', 'global governance', over and over, and never once slipping and saying 'global government'.

Fuck you Strauss-Kahn you crooked cuckold. Your New World Order's gonna fail, and all you criminal traitors are going to jail (God willing).

Hat tip: Goodnight Vienna

Saturday, 2 October 2010

"... with the co-operation of a sympathetic media..."

Ian Parker Joseph covers some very important information about the open conspiracy to set up a technological tyranny over us all. The enemies of freedom control the governments and the money printing presses and they are moving as fast as they can.

There's no time to watch the shadows dancing on the cave wall.

Friday, 1 October 2010

Short point, but well made



Here journalist Peter Oborne brings up the subject of what should have been a major scandal; the meeting of erstwhile Business Secretary Peter Mandelson and erstwhile Shadow Chancellor, now Chancellor George Obsorne with aluminium oligarch Deripaska on a Rothschild yacht around the time of the Bilderberg conclave in Greece.

It did kick up a little bit of dust, but the servants of the High Cabal commit their crimes in the open these days with impunity.

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

The secret treaty we should all be shouting about

From Mises Daily:

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human Civilization


A clandestine international treaty is currently being negotiated among parties including the United States, Canada, New Zealand, the European Union, Japan, Singapore, and Morocco. It can justly be called the greatest threat of our time to the advancement of human civilization. Considering the magnitude of the other abuses of power pervading the world today, this might seem an exaggeration, but the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) contravenes every principle of civilized society, both in its content and in the nature of the proceedings leading to its creation.

It threatens to undo the accomplishments of the great Internet revolution and to thrust humankind back to a time when individuals had no public voice and no countervailing power against politically privileged mercantilist institutions. ACTA tramples on essential rights that have achieved even mainstream recognition: innocence until one is proven guilty, due process, personal privacy, and fair use of published content. Moreover, because of its designation as a trade agreement, ACTA could be imposed on the people of the United States by the president, without even a vote of Congress...

Read the article.

Monday, 7 June 2010

Kissinger was at Bilderberg

How come Henry Kissinger can attend Bilderberg, surrounded by police and security, when he has an outstanding arrest warrent hanging over him in Spain?

Somebody ain't doing their job.

Sunday, 6 June 2010

Bilderberg: wounded and cornered

From Infowars:

"The 2010 Bilderberg agenda has been revealed by veteran Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker and it paints a picture of crisis for the globalists, who are furious at the increased exposure their gatherings have received in recent years, as well as being dismayed at their failure to rescue both the euro and the failing carbon tax agenda, but more alarmingly according to Tucker, the majority of Bilderberg members are now in favor of military air strikes on Iran."

Read the article here.