Awake Sheffield! The state is poisoning your children

What kind of sick scum add toxic chemicals to children's milk?

The sick scum who run the state indoctrination laboratories (aka schools) in Sheffield.

Via Natural News:

• Fluoride conference reveals fraudulent science behind mass fluoridation; fluoride policy is a public fraud
• Health Canada Suggests Lowering Fluoridation Levels to Protect Children's Teeth
• Dr. Hardy Limeback Comes to Alaska to Help Oppose Fluoridation
• Dr. Hardy Limeback Comes To Alaska To Help Oppose Fluoridation.
• Environmental groups petition EPA to retract fluoride pesticide tolerances on food
• Grassroots organization POWA launches campaign to outlaw fluoridation of municipal water supplies
• Toxic waste chemicals are disposed of by feeding to humans, then calling it fluoride
• TV Report Says Fluoride in Water Is Safe While Research Shows Otherwise
• Media Cries Foul When County Stops Fluoridating Water

The real reason for mandatory sex education for five year olds

Many people, especially parents, will question the sense in government plans to impose compulsory sex education on children at the earliest age possible. The real reason can be found by studying the ideas of population-control-freaks like Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 book 'The Population Bomb".

"We need a federal law requiring sex education in schools - sex education that includes discussion of the need for regulating the birth rate and of the techniques of birth control. Such education should begin at the earliest age recommended by those with professional competence in this area - certainly before junior high school.

By "sex education" I do not mean course focusing on hygiene or presenting a simple-minded "birds and bees" approach to human sexuality. The reproductive function of sex must be shown as just one of its functions, and one that must be carefully regulated in relation to the needs of the individual and society. Much emphasis must be placed on sex as an interpersonal relationship, as an important and extremely pleasurable aspect of being human, as mankind's major and most enduring recreation, as a fountainhead of humor, as a phenomenon that affects every aspect of human life... In short, sex as we know it, is a peculiarly human activity. It has many complex functions other than the production of offspring. It is now imperative that we restrict the reproductive function of sex while producing a minimum of disruption in the others."

More here.

Minister Hoon uses fake terror fears to justify fascist state

Individual rights rank very low to the control freaks of Fabian Socialism, such as Geoff Hoon, always ready to use the terrorist bogeyman to justify their ever-increasing Stasi-state.

Nato plans assault on rivals in opium trade

Whilst guarding the poppy fields of the warlords on their side, Nato like to burn the occasional crop in areas they can't control, to keep up appearances. Now the forces of the crumbling Anglo-American Empire plan to target the factories that turn the raw opium into heroin.

I guess they're running out of things to bomb.

(pic)

Not 'All along the watchtower'

Dylan's bitchy vignette à la Hendrix.

Simplicity

Dylan playing 'Love minus zero/no limit' from the movie 'Don't look back'.

Sunday sermon from Rev. Biafra

Wise words from Jello Biafra, highlighting the insanity of hemp prohition.

(Part 2 here) (Here are some of the many products that can be made from the miracle plant)

These are the people who want your information

The sick Hegelian state-worshippers who constantly seek to increase the violation of our privacy on the grounds of protecting us from nasty people have yet again demonstrated their utter incapacity to manage the data they already have. The MoD has lost the personnel data of 100,000 members of the armed forces via its corporate contractor EDS.

Not for the first time has the state proved itself to be drunk at the information wheel. As summarised by The Register:

"In January the MoD admitted losing a laptop with details of 600,000 applicants for the armed services. The data was unencrypted and the laptop, which was not password protected, was left in an empty car overnight.

In March it admitted losing 11,000 ID cards over the last two years.

In July it coughed to losing 87 storage devices containing classified material since 2003.

In September it was the turn of the RAF. It lost three hard disk drives containing information on all current and recently-ex members of the RAF - about 50,000 people.

Also in September it was an MoD staffer, on secondment to the Cabinet Office, who left two top secret intelligence documents on a train from Waterloo."

Tautology of the day: "Evil social workers"

The family has always been target number one for the social engineers. Hence their malevolence in the case of two children who are being deprived of their grandparents' love and a stable home life, all because the grandparents won't get down and lick the social workers' nazi boots.

"Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death!"

Patrick Henry addressing the Virginia Legislature, March 23 1775:

"No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free—if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending—if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained—we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable—and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace—but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

Thanks to Project Gutenberg

Barry Jennings: key 9/11 witness dies conveniently

One of the favourite fallacies for those that refuse to even consider that 9/11 may have been an inside job (N.B. it was) is that, if this were the case, the criminal government would kill people who knew about it.

People like Barry Jennings, you mean?

Martial law in America

The United States is now - literally - going into martial law with the deployment of US troops in a law enforcement role.

The mainstream media, such as CNN, report it as if it's a commonplace event, rather than an open and direct criminal act in violation of the Posse Comitatus Law. The report talks of 'scepticism' - perhaps the kind of scepticism the three little pigs may have felt when the wolf was at their door.

God help America now. Everything the Founding Fathers warned them about is coming true before their eyes. As Thomas Jefferson said:

"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."

O America, you did not pay heed, and now you have both tearing at your throat.

(pic) (Hat tip: Infowars)

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, and no dignity neither

You want to take a flight somewhere? Well, show me your cock. Show me your pussy. Let me stare at your naked body. That's the deal, folks. That's the deal our would-be slave-masters are bringing down on us. I'll keep pointing it out, and sooner or later you people out there will find the one thing that is a step too far. For some people, it'll be finger-printing your children, for others, it will be mandatory tracking devices fitted to your cars, for others it will be airport security oggling your naked bodies with the new generation of scanners.

Something, for fuck's sake, will wake you out of your stupor.