Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Another judge-assisted homocide


Q: What is appropriate punishment for a man found guilty of raping two women at knifepoint and considered, unsurprisingly, to be very dangerous?


Wait, wait! Before you answer, imagine you like dressing up in ridiculous 18th century costumes, that you don't give a fuck about the victims of this vicious criminal, or the future victims that you are about to make inevitable by your answer to this question, you're probably a bit bored, you're probably waiting to get off to your appointment with Madame Whiplash who's going to tie you to a bed and spank you for being a naughty boy, or perhaps defecate upon you because that's what gets you off. In short, imagine you're an average judge.

A: Three and a half years should do it. I'm sure he deserves another chance. It's not like he'd murdered anyone. Yet.

Thanks judge.

2 comments:

Single acts of tyranny said...

I don't think the elite or the judiciary care very much what 'outsiders' do to each other. Sure they have to pay attention to murder, but the rest of it? The sentences show they don't care.

Now if you don't pay your taxes, expect to be hammered. If you take the law into your own hands, that means usurping their authority, so again, expect to be hammered. Violate pointless, victimless laws and expect to be heavily smashed financially.

But just initiating force against other outsiders.... they don't care.

But,

Trooper Thompson said...

That's the way it is. Private crime is no threat to their monopoly.