Oh no, I'm an extwemist...

... so says Doktor Liam Mengele, chief PR Officer of the pharmacide industry.

According to the Times, swine flu shot pusher Liam said:

“We have had a lot of unfair public criticism and attacks in an attempt to scare people about a vaccine that’s potentially life-saving”.

Yeah, right. How unfair of the public to read the leaflet that comes with the mercury-laced, squalene-laced, live virus-containing, grown on a monkey's kidney poison that you wish to inject into little children and pregnant women, you sick fucker.

Carbon corporatism

Mark Wallace, writing at Devil's Kitchen, nails the reality of the EU's corporatist 'Emissions Trading Scheme':

"Despite all the rhetoric from politicians and eurocrats alike about helping the poor and the elderly, alleviating fuel poverty and reducing extortionate energy bills, the reality is that through the ETS they are increasing costs for UK consumers alone by £3 billion a year. Across the whole EU, between the scheme starting on 1 January 2005 up to the end of 2008, this monster cost over £67 billion.

This is the reality of the current tranche of flawed emissions policy: in the name of green policymaking, ordinary people who already struggle to heat the homes and make ends meet are being stung for billions of pounds a year. Where does the money end up? Well, a decent chunk is effectively handed straight to wealthy energy companies in windfall profits, kindly provided by Mr and Mrs Joe Public.

Don't think that the powers that be in Westminster and Brussels aren't aware of this, either. Indeed, the Express revealed this week in leaked EU Commission documents that there are plans afoot in Brussels to use the Emissions Trading Scheme as the basis of a pan-European, harmonised tax in order to fund the EU directly.

In short, they know perfectly well how profitable this enterprise can be for them - and they care not a jot that it is those scraping a living in the real world who suffer as a result."

You're not paid to advise, you're paid to tell the public that the government's right

Back in the days of Nazi Germany, there used to be a thing called 'German Science', a ridiculous concept, seeming to suggest that an experiment carried out in a German laboratory may produce a different result in a laboratory in another country, where foreign scientific laws held dominion.

Here in Fabian England, we have a similar concept . The head of the government's 'Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs' has been sacked, because he's not prepared to twist the scientific evidence to serve his control-freak New Labour masters, who want to strike a tough pose on illegal drugs.

Maybe I'm stretching it a little to find parallels between these two things. Nevertheless, it indicates how weak this government knows that it is, that it must get rid of any dissenting voice, and it makes a joke of the role of an 'Advisory Council', if the only advice it can give is flattery and support.

In sacking Professor Nutt, the control-freak New Labour government draws attention to the fact that all those other experts that they don't sack are kept in place because they tell them, and us, through the media, what they - the control-freak New Labour government - want us to hear.

Swine flu shot causes miscarriage

If I find any mainstream press prepared to cover it, I'll post the link, but I won't hold my breath, because this is the information you, the dumb public, ain't supposed to get, but pregnant women are being pressurised to take the swine flu and seasonal flu shots and they are known to cause miscarriages. I heard a guy on the radio telling how his friend's wife was persuaded to take the shot and within 24 hours she miscarried. Yes, it's anecdotal. No, it's not hard science, but I believe what he said. The apologists for pharmacide industry will claim it's a coincidence, but if this woman had drunk half a bottle of tequila the night before she miscarried, or if she'd fallen down a flight of stairs or if anything out of the ordinary happened, would you not at least consider the risk? How much more so, when there are thousands of examples of similar things happening with other shots.

Max Keiser in 'Fall of the Republic'

Here's Max giving his take on the criminal bankster oligarchy, from Alex Jones' new documentary 'Fall of the Republic'.

Plans for EU income tax exposed

Plans for the EU to steal money directly from everyone's pay packet have been leaked.

Maybe it's good. Maybe now people will realise that their country's sovereignty has been stolen.

When governments go bad

It is clear that our criminal government is drunk on power. Using the 'Enabling Act' tactic of a 'statutory instrument', it is empowering legions of public sector brownshirts to steal our property without due process.

This tyranny must be resisted.

Swine flu shot deaths reported in Sweden

The Digital Journal reports:

"There are reports from Sweden of possible deaths linked to the H1N1 vaccine; unconfirmed and unwelcome news which will surely complicate the very busy flu season that has descended on most of the northern hemisphere."

Hat tip: Infowars

The biggest heist in criminal history?

I know I've been overly reliant on the Daily Mail in recent times, but here is a story that should be read. It shows what happens when a police force of fellow civilians turns into a lawless paramilitary brigade.

A would-be demagogue speaks

Under the gathering darkness of Fabian tyranny, strange juxtapositions can be made out, despite the gloom.

On the one hand, all of us common people are now treated as potential predatory paedophiles, required to prove that we are not, by submitting ourselves to be logged into one of the state's gargantuan and porous databases. Only this official sanction, a piece of paper from a faceless bureaucrat, which in fact proves nothing, permits us to be considered untainted by deranged perversion.

On the other hand, those few despicable aberrations who prey upon the young, and are known, through conviction in a court of law, to pose a serious threat to our children, the officials of the so-called justice system will find any means at their disposal to leave them at liberty, and when they inevitably commit another crime, the same pantomime is repeated.

Common sense and our sense of justice is outraged and insulted day by day. This must change, we tell ourselves, and change it must, and change it can, and change it will when we finally break the conditioning that keeps us rooted in passive isolation.

The architects of the system that enslaves us know we despise them and that we want change. So they tell us we live in a democracy and every five years we get to choose between two factions - the red and the blue - but everything carries on as before. Soon there will be another election, and most likely the incumbents will be thrown out, because it is scarcely conceivable that any government could be worse, could be more destructive to our liberties and to the state of the nation. But torture doesn't get any less torturous, if they switch the guy who's winding the rack. There is no hope in the tories.

There is a way out of this. The scientific dictatorship will be defeated. It will not be easy. It may even be bloody, but anything that's worth anything is worth fighting for. On our side we have truth, justice and love. What do they have, but lies, fear and weakness?

Public enemy of the day: Judge Christopher Ball...

... who sentenced a serial burglar with 665 crimes on his record to ... a new start in another town, living rent free with his girlfriend.

Well done, Judge, you confirm every single thing I've been saying about you pack of degenerate, fancy-dress fuckheads. Ball thinks his grateful pal is going to turn over a new leaf. I'm hoping Ball will turn over a pile of leaves and disturb a slumbering rattle-snake.

The difference between murder and manslaughter...

... apparently is that manslaughter is when a convicted sex offender, set at liberty by our liberal legal authorities, kidnaps and kills a 17-year-old girl and dumps the body in a field, and murder is when a young man with no prior convictions defends himself from a burglar who has broken into his house. Simple really.

Divide and rule

Any form you fill in these days, whether it be a job application or a survey on your bin collection, there will be a section asking you to tick a box describing your 'ethnicity'. As time has passed this section has grown. At one time, perhaps - I forget, there was three categories. Now there are 15 or more, but still no guarantee any one of them will apply to you. With one such document before me, I asked a work colleague recently; "you're born and raised here, you're mother's English, but your father's Irish. So which box do you tick? 'White - British,' 'White - Irish', 'White - Other', or 'Mixed - Other'?". She was puzzled, and confessed she didn't know. I reassured her that there was no correct answer. And indeed there isn't. There's no scientifically-agreed definition of 'ethnicity', or at least if there is, no one's bothered to communicate it to the masses. Many confuse it with nationality - something by contrast with a legal definition - and when asked to tender their nationality will write 'Black British' or 'White British', as if these are two distinct countries. Maybe they know something I don't.

In the past, and perhaps this will not change, this colleague of mine would have ticked 'White - British' and not thought too much about it. But if 'White - Irish' is a different category entirely, and the monitoring of such things is so evidently important, it is her duty to desist, or else skew the data. Another colleague of mine is South African and has been brought up to consider himself 'coloured'. I have explained to him that that is not an acceptable term, but I'm not sure he understands. Further (re)education may be necessary.

Notwithstanding the professed laudable goals of this obsession with categorising people by race, ethnicity and/or bloodline, it sparks sinister memories; Nazi racial purity laws to ferret out Jewish forebears, or slave-era charts to sort the quadroons from the octroons, down to the 64th part. If this issue of ethnicity is so important, doesn't that mean the BNP have a point?

Indeed they do, but only within the twisted pseudo-logic of multiculturalism. For what are the BNP doing, but turning the rulebook back on its authors, proclaiming their rights as a distinct ethnic group, an indigenous people no less, demanding their seat at the table of group identity politics, this in sum being the logical progression from multiculturalism and the perverse and divisive incentives that it engenders. This leaves the liberals for a moment flustered, because it is their own logic they are confronted with. Flustered, but not for long, they can quickly fall back to name-calling: racist, fascist, nazi, fascist, racist. But will their mojo still work, now that they, the mainstream political, media establishment, are so discredited with the public?

Probably it will. Because even though they, Labour, Tory, LibDem, Guardian, Times, are despised and rightly so, people still won't go along with nasty Nick in great numbers. What is needed to overthrow the establishment, is a broad coalition, and the BNP is a symptom of the 'divide and rule' malaise that keeps them where they are (above us, laughing), not its antidote.

Job Section: Legal

Are you a colossal pervert, but as yet with no convictions?

Do you have a burning desire to protect vile predators from justice?

Do you have utter contempt for the public, with regard to their safety and opinions?

Are you prepared to overlook the most prodigious catalogue of crimes against the public good for a tuppence ha'penny sob story?

Do you enjoy dressing up in ridiculous costumes, all the while expecting to be taken seriously?

If any or all of the above apply to you, then a career in the Judiciary awaits!

The mother of all gerrymanders

Back in the 1980s, certain prominent tories on Westminster Council got were hit in a gerrymandering scandal, which led to eye-watering fines. Dame Shirley Porter was ordered to pay £27 million, and eventually settled by coughing up £12 million. Their crime was attempting to sell council homes in marginal wards, under the belief that home-owners were more likely to vote tory. Thus this policy of selling council properties, because it was targeted at marginal wards, was deemed gerrymandering. Strictly speaking, gerrymandering refers to fixing the boundaries of electoral districts in order to benefit one party, but by extension, in the case of Westminster, it can be applied to other ways to manipulate the constituents of an electorate.

To re-track, £27 million for a couple of council wards. So, when the New Labour government tries to gerrymander the whole country, as policy, for their own benefit, how much should they pay?

Orwell on the Fabians

"The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which 'we', the clever ones, are going to impose upon 'them', the Lower Orders. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to regard the book-trained Socialist as a bloodless creature entirely incapable of emotion. Though seldom giving much evidence of affection for the exploited, he is perfectly capable of displaying hatred - a sort of queer, theoretical, in vacuo hatred - against the exploiters. Hence the grand old Socialist sport of denouncing the bourgeoisie. It is strange how easily almost any Socialist writer can lash himself into frenzies of rage against the class to which, by birth or by adoption, he himself invariably belongs."

George Orwell - "The road to Wigan Pier" chapter 11

Only the good

Contempt

Is it any wonder that our so-called justice system is fucked, when people like this are put in charge of it? I wonder what he's wearing underneath. Stockings and suspenders? An ostrich feather up his arse? That would explain the facial expression. If he had a beard, he'd be Father Christmas. I suppose he thinks he looks dignified in that get-up. Here's the news flash, pal: you don't. You look like a bloody travesty, which is ironic really, seeing as what a travesty you and your pals in the Committee for the Release of Dangerous and Vile Felons AKA Her Majesty's Judiciary have made of the administration of justice in this sorry nation.

(pic)

Nationality: English. Ethnicity: Mind your own business

The last time I was prevailed upon to fill in one of those countless forms demanding my 'ethnicity', I put 'mixed race'. I'm part Anglo-Saxon and part Cornish, I explained to a bemused colleague (there's a bit of Norman in there, but I don't like to talk about it - bit of a family skeleton). I don't consider myself white or British, and I refuse to allow myself to be pigeon-holed by the PC pen-pushers. The time before that, I think I ticked 'other' and specified 'homo sapiens' in the space provided. But I'll stick with 'mixed race' for now. In any case, my ethnicity is a private matter. It's a very intrusive question, actually.

I've traced my family tree (some of it, at least) as far back as the 17th century, and it's all English, except for the Cornish bit, which is for the head-measurers something else entirely. A Celtic race, the Cornish, the original Britons, not like these Johnny-come-lately Germanic invaders (bloody Jutes, coming over 'ere, stealing our cattle). Still, the way our oh-so-liberal multi-culturalists are talking, perhaps soon they will replace the 'white British' tick box with 'mongrel'. They like to change the definitions on a regular basis, so we're never quite sure what the correct term is. I heard some antidiluvian refering to 'ethnic minorities' the other day, oblivious to the fact that the correct term is 'minority ethnic' (note to self: check this, it may have changed again).

Yeah, 'mongrel', that's what I hear the people of this island are, people like me. Sounds a bit of an insult, if you think about it. I mean, if you call someone in the street a mongrel, they could easily take offence. A bit like the term 'bitch': okay when discussing dogs, but commonly held to be derogatory when used in reference to a woman.

I saw this programme the other night, which got me thinking about such questions. Some guy, to whom these things mattered quite a lot, getting pilloried by a load of others, who were angry about it all. Why it is of such importance to the guy, I couldn't say, but those pitted against him were in such a hurry to deride his strange views, that they denied validity to his claims, even when they held at least some truth. One told us that Africans were wandering around the place back in the days of Rome, but did she realise that Africa to the Romans was a province on the Mediterranean around the city of Carthage, and not the continent we now know by that name?

The BNP is another party I'm not going to vote for, and the deal-breaker inter alia is their attitude to race. It certainly isn't their view on the EU or the carbon tax. But my failure to rally to their cause doesn't make me any more likely to support the mainstream LibLabCon.

You can fool some of the people...

From JBS:

"With the Copenhagen UN Climate Change Conference less than two months away, a new poll reveals that more and more Americans are seeing through the hype. Meanwhile, the Internationalists are squealing that Obama isn’t doing enough to push their agenda.

A poll by the Pew Research Center has documented a 20 point drop in the number of Americans who believe in anthropogenic (that is, man-made) climate change." (Read the article)

(Hat tip Fausty's Libertarian Blog for the vid)

Clean and serene

Here's a tune from Spaceman 3 which I always loved. The YouTube vid would jar with my William Blake aesthetic, so I've cut it down to size.

The spirit of Rainsborough

Sean Gabb of the Libertarian Alliance delivered a barn-storming speech, or at least that's how it reads, to a Conservative Association somewhere in England. Whether it was a case of pearls before swine, he would know better than I, but it fits within a fag paper of my own views, and he cited Thomas Rainsborough, which always gains favour in my eyes. I would reproduce it here, but would dwarf my own meagre output, nevertheless I urge my dear readers to check it out.

Death penalty wish list

I know the state can't be trusted not to execute innocent people, but I'm prepared to take that chance with these two monsters.

N.B. They'll be released in 5 to 6 years, because the judges of this country don't give a damn for public safety or common justice, or else maybe they're too busy dealing with other matters, which they consider of higher priority?

Paying for the bullet

Nice to know where my taxes are being spunked away: to spy on me. Just in case I'm Al Quaida, I suppose, or else a dangerous criminal, or some kind of criminal, or maybe I dropped some litter once or offered to babysit my friends' kid without a licence.

If you're watching, Big Brother: Go fuck yourself, you criminal scum.

Who'd be a teacher?

I've made my opposition to state-run schools very clear over the years of this blog. Here are two examples of why it can only get worse.

In the first instance, a man, well-respected, with years of service, is branded a criminal, loses his livelihood, will never teach again, because he manhandled a disruptive, abusive teenager out of his classroom. He didn't hit the kid, he didn't do anything wrong, and he certainly didn't do anything that would have been considered out of place when I was at school in the 80s.

In the second case, a teaching assistant does something similar, this time to an abusive teenager who threatens to stab him. Again, no physical harm was done to the little wanker, but the assistant is hauled through the courts (mercifully he is acquitted), and is even banned from living with his own children.

Anybody with any kind of double-figure IQ can understand why our society is fucked. Anybody, it seems, except the Fabian psychopaths who control the system. Or maybe, just maybe, this is exactly what they fucking wanted all along.

It is not Fabius Maximus who inspires them, but Milton's Satan: 'Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven', and hell is exactly where they're going and where they're dragging us all, if we don't smash their power.

(image)

15 Important Reasons Why You Shouldn't Vaccinate Your Children Against The Flu

Reproduced from Preventdisease.com:

This year it is more important that you protect your children and loved ones from the flu vaccines than influenza itself. Here are the reasons:

1. This flu is simply another flu. It is not unusually deadly. In fact, the H1N1 swine flu in circulation is less deadly than many other influenza outbreaks. The first 1000 confirmed swine flu cases in Japan and China produced zero deaths. The Centers for Disease Control alleges 36,000 Americans succumb to the flu each year, but so far, since March through August of 2009 (6 months), the swine flu has been attributed to ~500-600 deaths in the US. The swine flu of 2009 has already swept through the Southern Hemisphere’s flu season without alarm. Only exaggerated reports have been issued by the World Health Organization regarding hospitalizations required during the flu season in South American countries. Getting exposed to influenza and developing natural antibodies confers resistance for future flu outbreaks. Artificially boosting antibodies by exposure to flu viruses in vaccines is more problematic than natural exposure. Americans have been exposed to the H1N1 swine flu throughout the summer of 2009 with far fewer deaths and hospitalizations than commonly attributed to the seasonal flu.

2. The vaccines will be produced by no less than four different manufacturers, possibly with different additives (called adjuvants) and manufacturing methods. The two flu inoculations may be derived from a multi-dose vial and in a crisis, and in short supply, it will be diluted to provide more doses and then adjuvants must be added to trigger a stronger immune response. Adjuvants are added to vaccines to boost production of antibodies but may trigger autoimmune reactions. Some adjuvants are mercury (thimerosal), aluminum and squalene. Would you permit your children to be injected with lead? Lead is very harmful to the brain. Then why would you sign a consent form for your kids to be injected with mercury, which is even more brain-toxic than lead? Injecting mercury may fry the brains of kids.

3. In addition to failure to produce sufficient antibodies, this swine flu vaccine is brought to you by the same people who haven’t been able to adequately produce a seasonal flu vaccine that matches the flu strain in circulation. In recent years flu vaccination has been totally worthless because the strains of the flu in circulation did not match the strain of the virus in the vaccines.

4. This is the first year mock vaccines have been used to gain FDA approval. Mock vaccines are made to gain approval of the manufacturing method and then the prevalent virus strain in circulation is added just days before it is actually placed into use. Don’t subject your children to experimental vaccines. Yes, these vaccines have been tested on healthy kids and adults, but they are not the same vaccines your children will be given. Those children with asthma, allergies, type I diabetes, etc. are at greater risk for side effects. Children below the age of 2 years do not have a sufficient blood brain barrier developed and are subject to chronic brain infections that emanate into symptoms that are called autism. Toddlers should not be subjected to injected viruses.

5. Health officials want to vaccinate women during pregnancy, subjecting the fetal brain to an intentional biological assault. A recent study showed vaccines injected into women during pregnancy provoke a similar gene expression pattern in the fetus as that seen in autistic children.

6. School kids are likely to receive nasally-administered vaccines (Flu-Mist) that require no needle injection. But this form of live vaccine produces viral shedding which will surely be transmitted to family members. What a way to start an epidemic!

7. This triple reassortment virus appears to be man made. The H1N1 swine flu virus of 2009 coincidentally appeared in Mexico on the same week that President Nicolas Sarkozy of France visited Mexican president Felipe Calderon, to announce that France intends to build a multi-million dollar vaccine plant in Mexico. An article written by Ron Maloney of the Seguin, Texas Gazette-Enterprise newspaper announces a “rehearsal for a pandemic disaster” scheduled for May 2, 2009. The article says: “Guadalupe County emergency management and their counterparts around the country are preparing for just such a scenario…” This means county health authorities across the U.S. had been preparing a rehearsal for mass vaccinations prior to the announced outbreak in Mexico. Virologists admit this part swine flu/part avian flu/part human flu virus must have taken time to develop. But it somehow wasn’t detected by hundreds of flu monitoring stations across the globe. On April 24, 2009 Dr. John Carlo, Dallas County Medical Director, alludes that the H1N1 strain of the Swine flu as possibly being engineered in a laboratory. He says: “This strain of swine influenza that’s been cultured in a laboratory is something that’s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that’s been identified.” (Globe & Mail, Canada)

8. Recall the swine flu scare of 1976. In a politically charged atmosphere where Gerald Ford was seeking election to the Presidency, the swine flu suddenly appeared at a military base. Vaccine was produced and millions of Americans were vaccinated. But the vaccine was worse than the disease, causing hundreds of cases of Guillain Barre syndrome and a few deaths. In a replay of the past, the White House is directly involved in promoting the H1N1 2009 swine flu vaccine. The federal government will use federal funds to pay off schools to administer vaccines, promote vaccination via highway billboards and TV advertisements, and conduct military-style mass inoculations in such rapid fashion that if side effects occur, it will be too late. The masses will have been vaccinated already. Over $9 billion has been allotted by the federal government to develop and deliver an unproven and experimental flu vaccine. Don’t be a guinea pig for the government.

9. Researchers are warning that over-use of the flu vaccine and anti-flu drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza can apply genetic pressure on flu viruses and then they are more likely to mutate into a more deadly strain.

10. Most seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus strains tested from the United States and other countries are now resistant to Tamiflu (oseltamivir). Tamiflu has become a nearly worthless drug against seasonal flu. According to data provided by the Centers for Disease Control, among 1148 seasonal flu samples tested, 1143 (99.6%) were resistant to Tamiflu!

11. As the flu season progresses the federal government may coerce or mandate Americans to undergo vaccination. France has already ordered enough vaccine to inoculate their entire population and has announced that vaccination will be mandatory. The US appears to be waiting to announce mandatory vaccination at a later date when it can scare the public into consenting to the vaccine. The federal government is reported to be hiring people to visit homes of unvaccinated children. This sounds like the Biblical account of Pharaoh attempting to eradicate all the young Israelite baby boys. Must we hide our babies now?

12. Public health authorities have cried wolf every flu season to get the public to line up for flu shots. Health authorities repeatedly publish the bogus 36,000 annual flu-related deaths figure to scare the public into getting flu shots. But that figure is based on the combined deaths from pneumonia in the elderly and the flu. Maybe just 5000-6000 or so flu-related deaths occur annually, mostly among individuals with compromised immune systems, the hospitalized, individuals with autoimmune disease or other health problems. As stated above, the swine flu in full force has only resulted in ~500-600 deaths in the first six months in circulation and it is far more dreaded by public health authorities than the seasonal flu. The Centers for Disease Control issues a purchase order for flu vaccines and then serves as the public relations agency to get the public to pay for the vaccines. Out of a population of 325 million Americans, only 100 million doses of flu vaccine have been administered each year and no epidemic has erupted among the unvaccinated.

13. The news media is irresponsible in stirring up unfounded fear over this coming flu season. Just exactly how ethical is it for newspapers to publish reports that a person has died of the swine flu when supposedly thousands die of the flu annually? In the past the news media hasn’t chosen to publicize each and every flu-related death, but this time it has chosen to frighten the public.

While every childhood flu-related death should be considered tragic, and the number of flu-related pediatric deaths in 2009 is greater than prior flu seasons as a percentage, in real numbers it is not a significant increase.

According to data provided by the Centers for Disease Control, for week 34 ending August 29, 2009, there were 236 hospitalizations and 37 deaths related to the flu. That would represent just 5 hospitalizations and less than one death per State, which is “below the epidemic threshold.”

14. Public health officials are irresponsible in their omission of any ways to strengthen immunity against the flu. No options outside of problematic vaccines and anti-flu drugs are offered, despite the fact there is strong evidence that vitamins C and D activate the immune system and the trace mineral selenium prevents the worst form of the disease where the lungs fill up with fluid and literally drown a flu-infected person. The only plausible explanation as to why the flu season typically peaks in winter months is a deficiency of sunlight-produced vitamin D. Protect your family. Arm your immune system with vitamins and trace minerals.

15. Will we ever learn if the flu vaccine this year is deadly in itself? In 1993 the federal government hid a deadly flu vaccine that killed thousands of nursing home patients. It was the first year that flu shots were paid for by Medicare. The vaccine-related mortality was so large that this set back the life expectancy of Americans for the first time since the 1918 Spanish flu! Mortality reports take a year or two to tabulate and the federal government may choose not to reveal the true mortality rate and whether it was related to the flu or the vaccines. You say this couldn’t happen? It did in 1993!

Swine flu soft-kill unleashed

Compare and contrast these two statements, the first from the BBC, reporting the government's intended mass swine flu contamination operation, the second from the insert of one of the swine flu 'vaccinaton':

From next week GPs will begin inviting people with health problems, damaged immune systems and pregnant women to come forward for immunisation.


Safety and effectiveness of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children less than 4 years of age. (8.1, 8.3, 8.4)

Further reading of this insert and other swine flu shots show that the very people they are targeting are those that it is likely to do most harm to.

Do your own research!

More on the criminal bankers

Robert Gaylon Ross on the Alex Jones show, talks about the central banking system. (The rest of the interview can be found on funlimitingfactor's YouTube channel)

Hysteria in the service of treason

Just when you think Gordon Brown cannot stoop any lower in his quest to sell global tyranny, he finds another sub-basement level... but he's right about one thing:

"Let us be in no doubt then that this is a profound moment for our world – a time of momentous choice."

That's right, motherfucker. A choice between freedom and slavery. A choice of nation states, run by democratically-controlled, limited governments on one hand, and a New World Order run by criminal psychopaths that will make Mao's China look like a fucking holiday camp.

Fall of the Republic: released tomorrow

Alex Jones' latest info-bomb will be exploding all over the internet tomorrow. Get ready.

As Paul Joseph Watson writes:

"While the criminals who have hijacked the world financial system continue to pose as saviors and swallow up more power in the name of fixing the very problems that they created, Alex Jones latest documentary blockbuster Fall Of The Republic exposes the real agenda of the financial terrorists who have bankrupted America in their quest for world domination and global serfdom.

The majority of Fall Of The Republic is devoted to an in-depth investigation into how the vultures of global corporatism exploited the engineered financial meltdown to begin the step by step implementation of their economic new world order – a parasitical financial system expertly crafted to benefit the elite few while destroying the living standards of the middle class and sinking the planet into a new dark age."

Orwell on Dali

As mentioned on one of the comment threads below, the on-going case of Roman Polanski, and the indulgence some are prepared to hand him over the small matter of drugging and raping a child, reminded me of Orwell's essay 'Benefit of Clergy', on the subject of Salvador Dali. It's a favourite essay of mine, because it made me think in a different way about something, and made me see the decadence all around us that we have been conditioned to accept almost unconsciously.

Here's the first paragraph - read the rest here.

"Autobiography is only to be trusted when it reveals something disgraceful. A man who gives a good account of himself is probably lying, since any life when viewed from the inside is simply a series of defeats. However, even the most flagrantly dishonest book (Frank Harris's autobiographical writings are an example) can without intending it give a true picture of its author. Dali's recently published LIFE comes under this heading. Some of the incidents in it are flatly incredible, others have been rearranged and romanticised, and not merely the humiliation but the persistent ORDINARINESS of everyday life has been cut out. Dali is even by his own diagnosis narcissistic, and his autobiography is simply a strip-tease act conducted in pink limelight. But as a record of fantasy, of the perversion of instinct that has been made possible by the machine age, it has great value... (cont)"

(Click here for explanation of the term 'benefit of clergy') (pic)

Real truth on Real Time

Richard Belzer exposes the private Federal Reserve on Bill Maher's show.

Royal Society shills for GM industry

Despite public hostility to genetically-modified food, despite numerous studies linking genetically-modified food to cancer and infertility, despite not one shred of evidence that genetically-modified crops increase yields or benefit anyone or anything other than the satanic corporations that push them, the Royal Society is lending Monsanto and their pals a hand, by publishing a report calling for their introduction, using the tried and trusted tactic of asserting apocalyptic disaster if we don't.

According to the Telegraph:

"Many in the Cabinet and Whitehall appear to be convinced that Britain can no longer resist its introduction into the UK market".

Oh really. For what reason can Britain no longer resist this? Because of trade treaties that over-ride our national sovereignty, or because those many in the Cabinet and Whitehall have their pockets stuffed with brown envelopes from the biotech companies?

Hat tip: Alison

Nic, I hear you man.

"And certainly in the cities of Italy all that is corruptible and corrupting is assembled. The young are idle, the old lascivious, and each sex and every age abounds with debasing habits, which the good laws, by misapplication, have lost the power to correct. Hence arises the avarice so observable among the citizens, and that greediness, not for true glory, but for unworthy honors; from which follow hatred, animosities, quarrels, and factions; resulting in deaths, banishments, affliction to all good men, and the advancement of the most unprincipled; for the good, confiding in their innocence, seek neither safety nor advancement by illegal methods as the wicked do, and thus unhonored and undefended they sink into oblivion.

"From proceedings such as these, arise at once the attachment for and influence of parties; bad men follow them through ambition and avarice, and necessity compels the good to pursue the same course. And most lamentable is it to observe how the leaders and movers of parties sanctify their base designs with words that are all piety and virtue; they have the name of liberty constantly in their mouths, though their actions prove them her greatest enemies. The reward which they desire from victory is not the glory of having given liberty to the city, but the satisfaction of having vanquished others, and of making themselves rulers; and to attain their end, there is nothing too unjust, too cruel, too avaricious for them to attempt. Thus laws and ordinances, peace, wars, and treaties are adopted and pursued, not for the public good, not for the common glory of the state, but for the convenience or advantage of a few individuals."

Niccolo Machiavelli, "History of Florence and of the Affairs of Italy"

Gordon Brown to world leaders;

"Come to Copenhagen, and sell the last vestiges of your nations' sovereignty to the New World Order, based on a crock of stinking horseshit about how carbon dioxide is destroying the planet, totally disproven, totally ludicrous on its face. Don't worry about the thousands of scientists that dissent, we've got the mainsteam media cranking out the propaganda, we've got the lemming legions ready to demonstrate for 'climate action', and with national sovereignty and democracy finally destroyed we no longer need to care what the people want. So join us, as we go into the brave new world of tyranny and horror, brought to you by the people who funded Hitler, Stalin and Mao... "

... I'm paraphrasing.

Absent friends

It's good to see (or rather read) my old blogging buddy Alison fighting the good fight over at Tim Worstall's post on the yawn-o-thon Daily Mail versus the professionally outraged homophobo-heresy hunters.

I've never met her, and we disagree on many things, but she's got a good heart and I'm sure she's worth having around when it all kicks off.

Bisous a toi, j'espere que tout va bien.

Diversion ahead

This is ridiculous. There are very many well-documented cases of real brutality at Abu Graib and other detention centres, and yet, to show that the authorities take these things seriously, they are content to throw one particular, low-ranking soldier to the wolves. Oh, bravo!

Let this be a warning to all soldiers: the government doesn't give a fuck about you. They are happy to pose for a few publicity shots with the troops, and knit their brow in fake concern when your welfare is under discussion, but in their hearts they don't care, and if they need to burn one of you to make them look above board, they'll do so and not lose a wink of sleep.

German ministers to receive flu vaccine without deadly adjuvants... unlike the rest of the population

According to Spiegel, the German government are to receive special, adjuvant-free flu shots, whereas everyone else (who is dumb enough to roll up their sleeve) will get the one with mercury, squalene (linked to Gulf War Syndrome) and, according to German lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg, cancerous animal cells. Mmm, tasty.

Prison Planet, covering the Spiegel story, state:

"Spiegel reports that there is an “open rebellion” by general medical professionals and child physicians in Germany over use of the toxic vaccine. Dieter Ludwig, chairman of the drug commission of the German medical profession, told Spiegel that health authorities have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

On July 13, the World Health Organization ordered the inclusion of the deadly adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine. WHO’s vaccine advisory panel is stacked executives from Baxter, Novartis, GSK and Sanofi. Baxter’s own scientists have stated in the New England Journal of Medicine that adjuvants do not improve antibody response."

I think I'm gonna pass on the cancerous animal cells, if it's all the same to you Doktor Mengele cocksuckers.

Max versus the financial terrorists

From maxkeiser.com

Murky business

The Iranians are accusing the British and US regimes of involvement in the suicide bombing by Jundallah against the Revolutionary Guards. Naturally, this has been denied.

However, back in 2008 Seymour Hersh revealed a 'Presidential Finding' which sought $400 million for 'defensive lethal activity' within Iran with so-called dissident forces, such as Jundallah.

Hat tip: Max Keiser

Rum, sodomy and the backlash

It had to happen, didn't it? Somebody complained to the police about that article in the Daily Mail about that popstar who died. I was not inclined to comment on the matter prior to this moment, being of the opinion that freedom of speech means that the columnist can write what she wants, and if people want to complain or organise against her or her employers, that's all fair enough.

But it wouldn't be today's poor, benighted England if someone didn't get the police involved. Presumably somebody's feelings were hurt and that's a crime these days. It's pathetic, really.

"To the Deathstar"

Questionable taste, but quite funny.

Hat tip: Infowars

Lethal injection

The New York Times writes:

"As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry. But those events will not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine. That poses a public relations challenge for federal officials, who remember how sensational reports of deaths and illnesses derailed the large-scale flu vaccine drive of 1976. This time they are making plans to respond rapidly to such events and to try to reassure a nervous public — and headline-hunting journalists — that the vaccine is not responsible."

You got that? The untested swine flu shot is expected to be linked to deaths and major health complications, and the authorities are getting ready to cover it up. This is seen as a 'public relations challenge', which will try to learn lessons from the last time they tried to mass-inject the public with an untested flu shot and many people died and many more suffered serious side-effects. This, it seems is not a problem in itself. The problem is when people find out about it.

Hat tip: Infowars

Why the left hates libertarianism

Reading this LibCon post and the long comment thread reminds me of how much I (often) despise politics. Playground insults. Can I comment without becoming one of them?

The self-labelled 'Left', as represented by LibCon, seems to hate the concept of libertarianism. I believe this is because they have a guilty conscience. Many of them (of my vintage or older) remember the rotten old tories, and one of the reasons the tories were hated was because of their authoritarianism. Now these liberal lefties have a choice: they can face up to the reality of how authoritarian their own beliefs and, more importantly, policies are, and reassess their fundamental attitudes, or they can retreat into the cosy world of left vs right certainties.

The former requires thought. All the latter needs is a few targets for ad hominem abuse.

Get 'em young

From this BBC article:

"So why do English schoolchildren start at five, when almost everyone else in Europe starts later? Apart from the Netherlands and Malta, the only other education systems beginning at five are Scotland and Wales (with Northern Ireland even earlier at four).

The origin of such an early start, introduced in 1870, had little to do with education, says the Primary Review report. Entering full-time education at such a tender age meant reducing the malign influence of Victorian feckless parents - it was about child protection and social conditioning rather than learning."

Season of the Boot

I love it when all the women start wearing their boots again. It's one of the blessings of the colder months.

A trial, yes, but what's on trial in Manchester?

The BBC bends over backwards to make the bizarre and abhorrent news that the maniacal state intends to take photos of everyone's naked body who wants to fly from Manchester Airport. It's all to fight terrorism. Sure. You can say no. For now. How long before the choice is; the scanner or a full body search?

Of course, this is not just Manchester or the UK. The same project is being rolled-out across the globe. They call it 'a trial', but the machinery works, they know. What is on trial is whether the people will go along with it.

Who would notice, Denis?

Denis MacShane MP writes:

"The attempt by the law firm Carter-Ruck, acting on behalf of the oil firm Trafigura, to place a secret injunction on the media's reporting of an MP's question in the Commons sets a disturbing precedent, even if the order has now been dropped. If MPs were no longer to be able to say anything under parliamentary privilege against the rich and powerful, then the lawyers, off-shore media proprietors and state officials might as well dissolve parliament and run Britain without MPs."

I was going to make the point that, as MacShane and his fellow-travellers have done so much to hand over Parliament's sovereignty, (and not to its rightful owners, the people, but to the globalist oligarchy), it was a bit late in the day to start bleating about it. But when I re-read the paragraph above in isolation from the rest of the article, I thought maybe he has a point. Why not close down Parliament? Let the country see what difference it would make. I doubt the majority would notice, and without the puppet show of Westminster, people might be more inclined to look at who really is running this country.

War criminal Blair told so

From AFP:

"Peter Brierley, whose 28-year-old son Shaun died in March 2003, refused to shake Blair's hand when he offered it, telling the ex premier: "I'm not shaking your hand, you've got blood on it."

Blair was ushered away, but afterwards Brierley said: "I understand soldiers go to war and die but they have to go to war for a good reason and be properly equipped to fight.

"I believe Tony Blair is a war criminal. I can't bear to be in the same room as him. I can't believe he's been allowed to come to this reception," he added after the reception at the Guildhall in central London."

This should be everyone's reaction to that devil.

Incidently, the photo that accompanies the story yet again tries to represent Blair as some kind of holy man. He is not a holy man. He's a murdering piece of trash.

Life under the Fabians

The reality of life under a regime of Fabian control-freak social engineers is exposed by the case of two police women who are facing prosecution for looking after each other's children. This is now a 'crime'.

The minister Vernon Coker mumbles some platitudes about 'protecting children' and 'not penalising hard-working families', but when you set out to control every aspect of the lives of the people in this country, when you empower a bunch of clipboard-wielding stasi scum to prey on the rest of us, this is the shit that happens, ordinary people are made criminals, not because they have done anything wrong, but because they have exercised their free will, and this is the enemy of the Fabians, this is what they intend to destroy, so we can be their supplicant slaves.

Fuck Labour and their Fabian system, and a special fuck off to the tittle-tattling informer who called in the stasi.

Another paedo-protecting judge

Yet again the judiciary shows its unnatural urge to protect paedophiles. This time the offender is Judge Adrian Smith, who only had to wait eight days before his merciful treatment of a child rapist caused another child to be raped. He must be very satisfied with himself.